|
V.2 No 1 |
43 |
|||
|
Mismatched
ladder filters |
||||
|
|
||||
|
In
the case |
||||
|
|
or |
|
(29) |
|
|
unrealisable
in frames of the existing circuitry, the conditions for a pure progressive
wave along-the-circuit propagation take place at all the pass band, and (26)
– (28) take the form generalising the solutions for semi-finite ladder filters
that was presented in [6]. In particular, for the negative delay phase these
solutions take the following form: |
||||
|
|
(30) |
|||
|
In
all other cases, a complex superposition of the progressive and standing
waves will take place in the filter. Or rather, the conventional formulation
of such type of superposition does not reflect enough completely the essence
of processes, since the expression (26) more corresponds to the complex
superposition of two standing waves. However, further we will show on a
specific example that the signal phase at the filter calculated nodes (i
= 1, 2, … , n + 1) generally vanishes only in a countable number of
points of the amplitude-frequency characteristic, evidencing the standing
wave arising in the filter. Out of these points, dependently on the frequency
and number of the studied node of the filter, the phase may be as delaying as
advancing with the retaining resonance peaks of the signal amplitude. Another
feature of the presented solutions reveals at the complex value of |
||||
|
To
demonstrate more visually the described features of the solutions, determine
the input impedance of a ladder rLLC filter shown in Fig.
5. We choose this circuit because of a few reasons. It is quite simple, lest
to cram the investigation with the additional factors. On the other hand,
such circuits are often used for signal delay artificial lines. And by the
conventional concept, the matched load of the low-frequency filters must be
active, which makes the analysis more associative. At the same time, the
changes introduced to the circuit comparing with ideal LC filters are
sufficient to reveal the described effects, and the circuit itself cannot be
calculated directly by the two-port method, because it has the mismatched
input and output. |
||||
Contents / 35 /36 / 37 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 / 43 / 44 / 45 / 46 / 47 /